|
"What Is A
Seabiscuit Anyway,
Boss?" |
 |
Directed by Gary Ross -
Written by Gary Ross
Starring Tobey Maguire,
Chris Cooper, Jeff
Bridges, William H. Macy
Distributed by Universal -
2003 - 141m - Rated PG |

A
long shot becomes a legend
"Seabiscuit"
is a good movie that should have been a great
one. All the pieces were in place for this to be
a truly stunning film. The film possesses a
naturally inspirational story, a beautiful
setting and an extremely talented cast featuring
Jeff Bridges, Tobey Maguire and Chris Cooper in
leading roles. Yet, the film becomes mired down
largely due to the hesitant direction of Gary
Ross, who also wrote and directed
"Pleasantville" and scripted such wonderful fare
as "Big" and "Dave."
Ross co-wrote this script, and it is an
excellent, Oscar-nominated screenplay. Yet, what
he brings to the table as a director is an
obvious fear of an over-emotional film. There
are several scenes where I sat there watching
the actors, knowing what they could do...and
wondering why they didn't. It's as if Ross was
holding them back.
Ironically, the film's cinematography is also
Oscar-nominated...however, it's also one of my
concerns. While the camera work on the horses is
phenomenal, including during the races, there
were several almost "still" shots that struck me
as intentionally melodramatic and completely
pulled me out of the scene. For example, when
Red comes back to Seabiscuit for the first time
after their injuries and the camera pans down on
the bandages on both their legs. It was
needlessly melodramatic in a film that seems to
work hard to maintain a peaceful tone. This sort
of shot occurred on several occasions, and each
time I felt like the film had been disrupted. It
was a brief disruption, but a disruption.
I also grew tired of the shots of WPA and CCC
efforts throughout the film. While I understood
their purpose, it became overkill. In
particular, I was bothered by the black & white,
family at the radio shots prior to the big race
at Pimlico between War Admiral and Seabiscuit.
It completely disrupted the adrenaline and
energy around the big race. That, in fact, was
my biggest concern with the
cinematography...while it captured the beauty of
horseracing, seldom did I get the intensity and
suspense of horse racing. Having gone to the
Kentucky Derby several times, and to a local
horse track, I'm aware of the intensity and
emotion present. No matter how big the race, it
never felt like this intensity was captured on
film.
Randy Newman's soundtrack did a nice job of
setting the tone for the film, sometimes too
blatantly. Once again, I felt like the "race"
score was too peaceful and failed to set an
accurate horseracing mood.
Now, with all those complaints...how do I give
this film a "B"? This is a wonderfully scripted,
beautiful shot film in most cases. The
performances are, across the board, quite good.
Jeff Bridges is a natural here...while the role
of Charles Howard is not a huge stretch for him,
he adds significantly to the character in quiet
ways. Additionally, Chris Cooper is wonderful as
Tom Smith...had Cooper not won the Oscar the
year prior to this he'd likely have been
nominated for this performance. However, the
Academy now knows what he's capable of...and, as
good as he was here, he can be MUCH better and
add so much more to a role when given the
freedom to do so. The same is true for
Maguire...I'm a major Maguire fan, and he does a
nice job here...yet, in some ways, I almost felt
like I was watching him again in "Cider House
Rules." Maguire is capable of great depth as an
actor, and it felt like he was reined in here.
The rest of the supporting cast does a nice job
including William H. Macy and Valerie MaHaffey,
especially.
Fans of horseracing and any of these actors
should be happy with this film. While this is
not their best performances, each performer
gives a good performance and brings much to this
wonderful story. While we were repeatedly told
that Seabiscuit really galvanized the nation
during the Great Depression, this film really
wasn't able to capture the full power of this
story. Still, it does capture a beautiful,
inspirational story that I'm sure you will
enjoy.
©
Written by Richard Propes
TC Candler's Comment
One
goes into a film like this hoping for an
uplifting tale of redemption and perseverance.
One hopes to be inspired and motivated, perhaps
moved to tears. It seemed as if this was going
to be one of 'those' films. But, leaving the
theatre, I felt a strange sense of indifference.
'Seabiscuit', although well crafted, beautifully
shot and nicely acted, never seems to build as
much emotion as its subject demands. It is a
pretty good film, an easy recommendation, but it
feels flat somehow.
I think it is primarily the director's fault.
Gary Ross dials down the sentimentality at every
turn for fear that he may overdo it and have the
film appear sickly sweet. But certain films and
certain subjects can get away with that type of
emotional manipulation. I felt the same way
about last year's 'The Pianist', which also
avoided sentimentality at all costs. Generally,
that is a good rule to follow... but sometimes
directors pair down the emotion so much, that
their film loses a lot of the impact it could
have had.
Nevertheless, I still value the movie and
recommend it for the entire family. It is an
inherently great story of four broken souls who
persevere and work their way to the top. I wish
it had moved me more than it did, but I still
admire it for what it is... a nice film about
nice people and a nice horse... it is just plain
nice.
Jacob
Hall's Comment
N/A


|