|
"Napoleon's Not So
Dynamite This Time." |
 |
Directed by Todd
Phillips- Written by
Todd Phillips, Scot
Armstrong
Starring Billy Bob
Thornton, Jon Heder,
Horatio Sanz, Ben
Stiller, Jacinda Barrett
Distributed by MGM -
2006 - 100mins - Rated
PG13 |

|
Jacob Hall's
Review
|
 |
D |
|
| |
|
Too nice? Too honest? Too "you?" Help is on the way. |
| |
It’s
amazing how a genuinely harmless movie can anger me so much. There is
nothing particularly offensive in “School for Scoundrels.” But there
is nothing particularly funny or interesting, either.
A nice premise is squandered: Roger (Jon Heder) cannot ask out the
girl he loves or earn respect from anyone he knows, so he attends a
class taught by Dr. P (Billy Bob Thornton), who teaches his students
to succeed through power and lies. Roger gets so good at this that Dr.
P tries to take him down a level…by dating the woman he loves.
Why did this movie offend me? Perhaps because it is one of the most
trite, clichéd, audience insulting movies I have seen in 2006.To give
you an idea of exactly how lame this movie is, consider that the
climax involves the hero trying to stop the woman he loves from
getting on a plane with his rival. Stop reading for a moment and
think. How many times have we seen this conclusion in how many movies?
I mean, damn! There is not even an attempt to make this
“run-to-the-terminal-at-the-last-second” ending entertaining, romantic
or exciting.
Okay, I’m not sold on Todd Phillips being a competent director. This
is the third movie of his that I have seen and easily the weakest and
that is saying a lot when those previous moves were “Starsky and
Hutch” and “Old School.” Mr. Phillips does not seem to have any idea
how to shoot comedy or edit a gag in way that makes it funny. I can
see images and hear lines in his movies that should be truly
hilarious, but I can’t laugh because there no comic timing in the
direction.
Comic timing is also lacking in Jon Heder, who pulls out his tired
Napoleon Dynamite shtick yet again. I did not find him funny in
“Napoleon Dynamite.” Therefore, I do not find him funny doing the same
performance here. He breathes through his mouth and says nerdy things
scripted by someone else. That is the extent of Heder’s acting
ability.
The bright spot of the movie is Billy Bob Thornton, playing a sadistic
creep, a role that he wears like an old glove by now. Although he is
just going through the motions, Thornton managed to get the only
laughs in the movie. Even then, his character is incredibly
underwritten and barely has any screen time before he becomes the
“villain.”
Support comes from Michael Clarke Duncan in yet another piss-poor
comedic supporting performance that only further distances him from
his work in “The Green Mile,” Ben Stiller in a cameo so bad that it
only further distances him from his only genuinely great performance
in “The Royal Tenenbaums” and a cast of “young comedic talent” as I
have heard it described, including Horatio Sanz, proving that his
terrible work on SNL is the extent of his comic ability.
This is the type of movie that makes me bitter about the medium. It’s
not bad enough to be memorable, just sloppy and dull. It feels much
longer than its 100 minutes and I did not even make an effort to stay
for the end credits like I usually do. I just wanted to get out the
theatre so I could forget “School for Scoundrels” as soon as possible.
|
| |
|
© Written by Jacob Hall -
Email
Me! |
TC Candler's Comment
I enjoyed the
film, slight as it was. There is nothing
particularly substantial here... it is merely
amusing enough to merit a recommendation.
I think Jon Heder plays "pathetic loser" better
than almost anyone. I think Billy Bob
makes a terrific scoundrel. And Jacinda
Barrett is spot on as the idyllic girl next door
that every guy would love to date. It
ain't Shakespeare... but it is a nice rom-com,
deserving of a place in the pantheon of good
date movies.
Richard Propes' Comment
I like Jon
Heder.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying he's a
brilliant actor...he's not.
I'm not saying he's anywhere near one of my
favorites in cinema. In fact, I would never go
see a film simply because it was advertised "Jon
Heder film."
I'm simply saying "I like Jon Heder." The BYU
film student was paid $1,000 for his break-out
role in "Napoleon Dynamite," and since that time
has practically cornered the market on loveable
losers.
Heder is a faithful Mormon and, from what I
hear, quite a nice guy whose values have not
been compromised by his modest film success.
I like, respect and enjoy Heder.
Jon Heder, however, was miscast as a foil to
Billy Bob Thornton in "School for Scoundrels," a
film based upon a novel by Stephen Potter.
Heder portrays Roger, a young guy who is so
timid, so nice and such a pushover that he
doesn't even qualify as a loser. Heder, in
reality, pulls off early Roger quite nicely.
It's reminiscent of his performance in the
almost embarrassingly goofy "The Benchwarmers,"
in which Heder donned a protective helmet to
play an obviously slow, still living at home
young man who was, say it with me, a loveable
loser.
In this film, however, Heder experiences a
transformation throughout the film that becomes
increasingly unconvincing as Heder is
transformed from an insecure, wimpy pushover to
a risk-taking, assertive and semi-confident man
after taking a class designed to teach him
confidence and turn him into a lion taught by
Dr. P (Thornton) and his sidekick, Lescher
(Michael Clarke Duncan).
The class seems to be working, and Roger asks
the object of his affection, Amanda (Jacinda
Barrett), out on a date despite the constant
harassment of her roommate (Sarah Silverman).
What Roger doesn't realize, of course, is the
more successful he becomes the more competitive
Dr. P becomes. Thus, the roar of the lions
begins and, unfortunately, this is where the
charm and humor in the film largely ends.
As the two begin one-upping each other, the
situations turn from humorous to downright
vicious, and Heder, unconvincing as a more
assertive Roger, simply can't keep pace with
Thornton, practically the master at this sort of
darkly comic, one-upping, stab you in the back
and smile about it character.
In a year in which darkly comic and biting films
like "Borat" and "Thank You for Smoking" have
experienced box-office success while perfectly
blending social satire, outrageous comedy and
walking the cinematic tightrope of taste,
"School for Scoundrels," directed by Todd
Phillips ("Starsky & Hutch" and "Old School"),
often feels like a mismanaged, safe and bland
addition to the dark comedy sub-genre.
The Phillips version of risk-taking seems to
exist only in 2-3 references to anal rape
involving Lescher, references that never seem to
go anywhere and are too vague to be effective.
Supporting characters are too thinly developed
to really be effective, particularly Roger's
classmates including Walsh (Matt Walsh), Diego
(Horatio Sanz) and Eli (Todd Louiso). Louiso
again reminds why he's one of the more
dependable supporting actors, and may very well
have been a more logical choice for the lead
role.
With almost no chemistry to speak of, both Heder
and Jacinda Barrett feel awkward in their scenes
together. To Barrett's credit, she manages to
portray a sort of innocent, girl-next door image
that makes the attraction semi-believable.
Silverman, on the other hand, is given almost
nothing to do and does, well, almost nothing. A
brief appearance by Ben Stiller as Lonnie, one
of Dr. P's previous victims, is portrayed way
too cartoonish and is completely out of place in
the film.
"School for Scoundrels" isn't a particularly
awful film...not at all. It simply falls far
short of its potential, and feels like a wasted
opportunity to make 2006's third fantastic dark
comedy. Instead, it becomes yet another in a
long line of 2006's remarkably unfunny comedies.
A strong performance by Thornton, a nice turn by
Todd Louiso and the lovely Jacinda Barrett will
make "School for Scoundrels" a decent DVD rental
when it's released in the near future.


|