LINKS

 
 
 

 

 

LITTLE CHILDREN

"Little Children Naively Wish for Happily Ever After..."
Directed by Todd Field - Written by Todd Field
Based on the Best Selling Novel by Tom Perrotta
Starring Kate Winslet, Patrick Wilson, Jennifer Connelly, Noah Emmerich
Gregg Edelman, Mary B. McCann, Jackie Earle Haley, Jane Adams
Distributed by New Line - 2006 - 130m - Rated R

TC Candler's Review

A

 
There are brilliant films -- and then there are films with brilliance in them.  "Little Children" is the latter.  It may be the most disappointing four-star film I have ever seen.  I felt so unsatisfied as I left the theatre.  Perhaps that was the point.  Perhaps the director wanted me to feel like the characters.  I was left pondering, "What might have been?"
 
Unhappy marriages.  Unsatisfied lives.  There is nothing more depressing than living a boring life.  Throw in some toddlers, and there is no greater sense of entrapment.  Poor decisions, early in life, can lead to desperate choices later.  And there is no worse decision than picking the wrong person to spend your life with.  There comes a time in every marriage, even the seemingly happy & healthy ones, when you stare across the breakfast table and think that you'd rather be staring at someone else.

"Little Children" stars Kate Winslet and Patrick Wilson as two halves of separate marriages, each with a child, whose playground afternoons fatefully merge their discontented worlds.

Sarah Pierce (Winslet) is married to a dullard addicted to an internet fetish site.  Her husband is a virtual non-entity in her life, as she busies herself with their daughter, her nightly exercise walk and psychoanalyzing the local soccer-moms.  The comparison to Madame Bovary's story becomes evident when she is invited to a local book club meeting.

Brad Adamson (Wilson) has a rather different case of ennui.  He is the stay-at-home father married to Kathy (Jennifer Connelly), a somewhat emotionally distant wife who brings home the family bacon as a documentary filmmaker.  Their marriage is one governed by her permission.  Consider the scene where he submissively suggests that he might get a cellphone.  Also, notice the nervousness that accompanies a hint of rare sex.  Brad doesn't really feel any different than a loyal pet gleeful at the occasional treat.

The connection between Sarah and Brad is sparked by an innocent kissing prank, intended to make the gaggle of conservative suburban mothers ravenously jealous.  They refer to Brad as "The Prom King", admiring from a distance, never having mustered up the courage to even speak to him.

Winslet and Wilson play these characters with an understated melancholy -- unearthing their mutual attraction, not in a fit of passion, but in the natural course of daily events.  Brad and Sarah feel right together.  They feel safe together.  They neither feel superior to, nor condescended by one another.  They fill each other's voids.  It is only inevitable that they give in to temptation.

This tremendously observant film is not just about the connection between the central couple.  There are periphery characters, not the least of which are the other marital halves.  Gregg Edelmann looks the part of a bedraggled, office-tied, salesman who is utterly unaware of the stench-of-boring that exudes from every pore of his skin.

Jennifer Connelly delivers, yet again, in a stark performance that requires her to impact the viewer with limited screen time.  There are two scenes where her intense glare speak a thousand words.  It is a powerful, if underwritten, turn.

Noah Emmerich and Jackie Earle Haley have complex roles that demand dramatic shifts of tone.  Both play extremely flawed characters without exploiting or sympathizing those flaws.  And Jane Adams, one of my favorite character actresses, delivers a heart-wrenching portrait in a small side-chapter of the film.

However, it is the leads who deliver the finest work.  Kate Winslet is virtually unchallenged as the definitive actress of this era.  She never misses the mark.  Her role as Sarah is intricate and deep, beyond the actions and the words.  She is able to craft a complete embodiment of loneliness and the struggle to attain a morsel of happiness in this sad world.  Winslet has paid her dues with great roles for over a decade -- It is time for her Oscar moment.

Patrick Wilson, also seen the in the fantastic indie thriller, "Hard Candy", adds to his impressive résumé with this role as a directionless man, almost begging to have someone show him the way to contentment.  It is superb work.

I also want to give a special nod to the narration.  It is deliciously delivered throughout the film, adding a very literary feel to the proceedings.  There is a rather comical use of it during a football scene, mimicking the renowned NFL films voiceovers.

The problem, which causes me to proclaim this to be the most disappointing four-star film ever, is that it has misplaced focus.  I don't mind a film that meanders.  I don't mind a film that has multiple characters and threads.  However, I do mind when a film takes me away from what I am truly interested in, only to show me threads and characters that have overstayed their welcome.  "Little Children" works masterfully when it tells the central story of Sarah and Brad.  It derails ever so slightly when it spends an inordinate amount of time with the two flawed characters played by Emmerich and Haley.  One a vengeful ex-cop, the other a released pedophile... Both are interesting diversions, but neither are deserving of as much attention as the camera ultimately gives them.  I would much rather have spent more time with the main couple or their spouses.

I felt like it was Thanksgiving dinner... only I got tons of stuffing and got screwed on the turkey.  Sure... the stuffing is good.  But I wanted more turkey damn-it!!!  And where's my cranberry sauce?

"Little Children" comes microscopically close to being an insightful masterpiece on the disillusionment of suburban marriage.  It gets too involved with the sub-plots to fully achieve that goal.  However, when it does get back on track, this 2006 beauty gathers steam like an old locomotive headed to one of two places -- happily ever after or the tragedy of a boring life.

 
© Written by TC Candler - Email Me!

How We Rated This Film

TC Candler -

A
Richard Propes -    
Jacob Hall - B

Richard Propes' Comment

n/a

Jacob Hall's Comment

It has been less than a day since I’ve seen it and I already have a love/hate relationship with this film.

So much works here. So much is beautiful, funny, disturbing and engrossing. In equal amounts, quite a bit doesn’t work at all.

“Little Children,” an adaptation of Tom Perrotta’s novel, follows a group of characters whose lives intersect and clash. Sarah (Kate Winslet) escapes her young daughter and her smut addicted husband through an affair with Brad (Patrick Wilson), whose wife, Kathy (Jennifer Connelly) wears the pants in the family. Meanwhile, Brad’s friend, former cop Larry (Noah Emmerich) spends his days harassing sex offender (Jackie Earle Haley) who has moved back into the neighborhood.

“Little Children” is meant to be a dramedy, but therein lies the main problem with the film: the humor and the drama clash at every moment and while they work on their own, they don’t work together. Some films have been able to place big laughs before and after tragic moments (“The Royal Tenenbaums” comes to mind) but “Little Children” director Todd Fields doesn’t seem to grasp that quality. A huge, important dramatic scene will come right after an overly goofy comedic scene and the two end up negating each other. It’s hard to laugh at the comedy and it’s hard to appreciate the drama.

The acting here is pretty much flawless, however, with Winslet proving yet again that she is the one actress of her generation who will no disappoint under any circumstances. I’ll take a stab in the dark and say that come Oscar time, Winslet will take home a statuette for her work here. It’s a painful, unique and difficult performance that could have become melodramatic, but Winslet pulls it off. Patrick Wilson also avoids the inherent melodrama that usually comes with these kinds of stories and he becomes the perfect balance to Winslet.

Emmerich and Haley, two “Hey, I see that guy all the time but don’t know his name” type actors give the strongest work of their careers, proving that the nameless, but brilliant, Hollywood character actor is far from extinct.

The real disappointment in the acting department is Jennifer Connelly, who, despite a few good scenes, has almost nothing to do and therefore nothing to chew on. She is in the film for about ten minutes, does very little and disappears before the ending. As a man who finds Connelly to be one of the most talented and attractive women in modern film, this is disheartening, to say the least.

I like the train motif. I like the dual meaning of the title that becomes incredibly apparent as the film goes on. Even the sex scenes between Winslet and Wilson are fantastic; it’s hard to shoot sex without it looking pornographic, but Fields pulls it off. The film looks fantastic as a whole.

Then there’s the narration.

If you’re going to have a narration over a film, you should either commit to it or drop it. This narration shows up, disappears for thirty minutes, pops up again and so forth. It feels lazy; whenever it’s too difficult to prove a point, the narration pops up.

When it IS being used, the narration provides a fantastic satiric bite for the comedy, but it cheapens the drama. It’s a lose-lose situation. This narration should have been lost in an early draft of the script.

My grade teeter-totters between a B and a B-, but I’m giving the higher grade because there truly is a lot to appreciate here, even if the end result is the biggest disappointment of the Oscar season, right up there with “Flags of Our Fathers.”

I do heartily endorse Winslet for an Oscar, though. She is overdue.


TRJ Enterprises © 2005
Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Contact Us - Legalities


 


ADVERTISING