|
"Barrett and Miller
Deliver the Film's Best
Performances..." |
 |
Directed by Robert
Benton - Written by
Nicholas Meyer, Philip
Roth
Starring Nicole Kidman,
Anthony Hopkins,
Wentworth Miller,
Jacinda Barrett
Distributed by Miramax -
2003 - 106mins - Rated R |

Underwhelming...
There is
something very strange about a film that
features four renowned actors (Nicole Kidman,
Anthony Hopkins, Gary Sinise & Ed Harris), but
whose best performances comes from rather
unknown thespians named Jacinda Barrett &
Wentworth Miller.
Based on a best selling novel by Philip Roth,
"The Human Stain" is an intriguing film about a
New England literary classics professor named
Coleman Silk (Hopkins) who is forced to resign
over a misinterpreted racial slur. The irony is
that he is a light-skinned black man who has
been hiding his heritage for most of his life.
The story also focuses on his friendship with a
reclusive writer (Sinise) and his love affair
with a tragedy stricken cleaning woman named
Faunia (Kidman).
We also get flashbacks to Coleman's youth, as he
leaves home, joins the navy and climbs the
junior boxing ranks. The young Coleman is played
rather well by Wentworth Miller and his love
interest is delivered in a emotional turn by
newcomer, Jacinda Barrett.
What is also extremely odd about this film is
that although the story is consistently
interesting and involving, the script is
awkwardly melodramatic in parts and the acting
is surprisingly heavy-handed and forced. I have
to admit that I have not read the acclaimed
novel, but I can't imagine that this film does
it justice. I think this is the kind of story
that would play better on the page than it does
on screen.
I also want to stress that Anthony Hopkins and
Nicole Kidman are two of my favorite actors of
all time. I think of them both as masters of the
craft. But Nicole is given a character whose
lines are so awkward that they sound like
musical scales being played with one wrong note.
Sometimes it is enough to make you cringe. I am
not sure that any actress could have pulled this
role off, but Nicole tries so hard to make it
work that I am forced to lay most of the blame
on her.
The other extreme distraction is the dreadful
miscasting of Hopkins in the lead role. I was
not able to buy him as a black man, nor was I
able to accept the sexual relationship between
he and Nicole Kidman. This film feels like a
grand symphony played with out-of-tune
instruments.
And yet, with all that said, I never found
myself bored or irritated enough to consider
this a bad movie. It held my interest from
credits to credits.
I am going to give this film the most minor of
recommendations but I doubt that I am ever going
to want to see this film again.
©
Written by TC Candler
Richard
Propes' Comment
This film, based on the novel by Phillip Roth
and directed by Robert Benton ("Kramer vs.
Kramer") is an oddly unappealing yet somewhat
effective drama starring Anthony Hopkins and
Nicole Kidman with strong support by Ed Harris.
Hopkins portrays Coleman Silk, a college
professor...who resigns after finding trouble
for using a word "interpreted" as a racial slur,
"spooks." The film has multiple side stories,
most of the smaller ones interesting, but the
relationship between Hopkins and Kidman is
decidedly lifeless despite strong performances
by both Hopkins and Kidman...it's together that
simply doesn't work well...individually, they
are fine and this is one of my favorite Kidman
performances.
The script contains none of Roth's trademark
wit, and is a bit jumbled throughout the film
trying to balance multiple storylines.
Additionally, a performance by Gary Sinise is
remarkably wooden and boring.
This film should have been great, but ends up
being only slightly above average with nothing
special or unique to offer. Fans of Kidman and
Hopkins may be pleased just seeing the
individual performances, but Roth fans are sure
to be disappointed
Jacob
Hall's Comment
n/a


|