Okay, "The
Day After Tommorow" is a film by Roland Emmerich,
and it's...it's...g-g-g...ggood...Wow. Who would
have thought, real quality from the man behind
"Independence Day" and "Godzilla." Of course,
the film is far from perfect, but so much of it
is fun and exciting, that I can almost disregard
such things as acting, and story...after all,
it's summer! Who needs those!
The story of "The Day After Tomorrow" is one
that many liberals have been using as a case to
condemn conservatives. I will not mention this
again, because the story is so corny, it's only
embarrassing to our friends on the Left. The
story is this: there has been so much global
warming, that the polar ice caps are melting,
causing ocean temperatures to drop, causing huge
storms, causing...a new Ice Age? Whatever. No
one listens to climatologist Jack Hall (Dennis
Quaid) when he warns them of upcoming disaster.
Then, in typical Roland Emmerich fashion, havoc
breaks loose, and major cities are destroyed,
courtesy of visual effects.
As corny as the story is, and as bizarre and
unconvincing as the "fake science" is, I found
myself in great awe of many of the film's
aspects. First off: the visual effects are
simply astounding. If the effects guys don't
have Oscars next year, then something is
horribly wrong. Massive tornadoes rip through
Los Angeles, gigantic tidal waves flood
Manhattan, and then the giant freezing comes,
and the entire northern hemisphere becomes an
icy tomb. I never doubted that everything was
real. It's completely convincing. Since I am
terrified of weather as it is (tornadoes scare
the hell out of me), I was truly frightened by
many of these scenes.
Visual effects aside, the film is corny, and
filled with flat characters. Quaid sleepwalks
through his role, and the talented Jake
Gyllenhaal deserves more dimensions. I still
found myself liking the characters because they
maintain and "everyman" feel, but I could never
relate to them. They also do increasingly stupid
things, as all Roland Emmerich characters do.
The direction is by no means good, and the
writing (co-written by Emmerich) is standard,
Hollywood stuff.
What then, makes "The Day After Tomorrow" so
gripping besides visual effects? It's hard to
explain through print, but I'll try. Roland
Emmerich is a mediocre director and a a sub-par
writer, always has, and probably always will.
But while he will never mature as a
writer/director, he has already matured as a
filmmaker. I compare him to Michael Crichton.
Crichton isn't a very good writer, but he can
tell a damn good story.
In a nutshell, it's all just a disaster movie in
the first half, and a survival film in the
second half, but it's one of the best of it's
kind. It also tries to express a theme. A theme
about the environment and how we must protect
it. A theme about-
Ahh, never mind. "The Day After Tomorrow" is as
much about global warming as "Independence Day"
was about politics.
©
Written by Jacob Hall
TC Candler's Comment
Too heavy
handed with its message. Too insanely
implausible to be taken seriously. Some of
the effects were very effective. Some of
the performances are worthy of note (Gyllenhaal
and Rossum). But in general, this film
failed to win me over.
Richard
Propes' Comment
Have you ever watched a film where at the end
you found yourself just sitting there watching
the screen thinking to yourself "Wow, I did not
like that film at all?" "The Day After Tomorrow"
is such a film for me.
Perhaps this is a film that begged to be seen on
the big screen, however, since they chose to
release it on DVD I will have to review it from
the "small screen" angle. I found the film to be
filled with horrid dialogue, an idiotic and
unsatisfying plot, wooden performances and
dazzling but amazingly fake looking special
effects.
I
rate this film a D+, because these are, in fact,
amazing special effects...I just don't think
they were effectively used. There are some
amazing production values here, but most is
fairly laughable from the set design, to the
atmospheric qualities to the costuming.
Basically, this Emmerich took a bunch of amazing
special effects and still managed to make a
crappy film that bored the heck out of me. Wow.