|
"I Reckon We're
Outnumbered..." |
 |
Directed by John Lee
Hancock - Written by
Stephen Gaghan, Leslie
Bohem
Starring Billy Bob
Thornton, Jason Patric,
Dennis Quaid
Distributed by Buena
Vista -
2004 - 137mins - Rated
PG13 |

|
Jacob Hall's
Review
|
  |
C |
|
Living in
Texas for a decent part of my life, I have had
to learn two things involving Texas history:
1. I had to learn it. It's a required course in
4th and 7th grade. Not too many complaints on
this. The Lone Star State has a fascinating and
shady history that history buffs will love.
2. I've also had to learn to put up with the
Texas Flag waving lunatics who are convinced
that Texas is the best thing since the toaster
and will trample and devour anyone who points
out a fault in the modern condition of the state
or a corrupt moment in it's history.
"The Alamo" was directed and written by one of
the above mentioned flag-waving lunatics.
Originally set to be directed by Ron Howard, who
planned a super-bloody, "Saving Private
Ryan"-type film that wouldn't hide the hidden
truths of the Alamo, a change in plans allowed
John Lee Hancock to create an ode to Texas
pride. The type of film that kept Texas theatres
packed for weeks by the time it had bombed
because the rest of the country didn't give a
damn for Texan propaganda.
Everyone knows the story: The Texans rebel
against the vicious and evil Mexican army led by
Santa Anna. General Sam Houston is still
training an army. 200 brave men die defending a
fort called The Alamo, buying Houston enough
time to get his army in shape.
What the filmmakers decided to leave out: The
Mexican government offered Americans a damn good
deal to come to Texas and settle the land. Lots
and lots of land for free. The one condition? No
slavery on Mexican territory. Well, fiddle-dee-dee,
they bring their slaves anyway, and won't send
them back or free them when the Mexican
government asks. Americans are offended, after
all, how can they grow crops without SLAVES?
They claim they are having their rights taken
away and rebel. The Mexican army does what any
country would do: fight back. No nation is
stupid enough to have it's valuable land taken
away by a bunch of farmer with squirrel guns!
When "The Alamo" begins, there is much talk
about how they are "fighting for freedom"
without the slavery aspect. We are supposed to
assume that the Mexicans are evil for no
apparent reason. They keep talking about
freedom...for a long time. When they finally get
to the Alamo, they barricade themselves and talk
about freedom and responsibility for a longer
time. Yaaaawn. Then, when the attack comes,
there is an explosion of harsh PG-13 violence
that is quick, brutal, and the best scene in the
film. The siege is remarkable.
A great battle is no reason for a film to be
great, though. Between the flag-waving
theatrics, Hancock has tried to show that not
everyone at the Alamo was perfect. Col. William
Barrett (Patrick Wilson) Travis is the 1800s
version of a yuppie who abandoned his pregnant
wife. Jim Bowie (Jason Patric) is an angry and
surly drunk who often whips out his large knife
in a dramatic way to provoke a fight. Both
performances are bad, but neither can mimic the
supreme, awful badness of Dennis Quaid as Sam
Houston. I often enjoy watching Quaid, and he is
usually a fine actor. But when he is bad, my
God, he is BAD. His role here is not quite "Dragonheart"
bad, but I'd say it's pretty close. Houston
gives inspirational speech after inspirational
speech, and soon, his very appearance on screen
drew giggle from me. Quaid seems to be
attempting a southern accent, but what he sounds
like is a man who must YELL EVERYTHING HE SAYS
in half Irish, half sumthin' else way. Oh, by
the way, his negative character trait is that
he's a drunk.
There are other characters, but few of them are
worthy of mention. Juan Seguin shows up for a
few minutes, but does just about nothing.
Hancock said that he wanted to show the Latinos
who fought at the Alamo and give them respect.
He has done so by making them Hispanic
stereotypes who occasionally make background
noise while Bowie and Travis argue.
The only good performance in the film is
actually a great one: Billy Bob Thornton as Davy
Crockett. Crockett was a washed up man by this
point in his life, living off his fame but
desperate to to something with his life.
Thornton is great, and his scenes are noticeably
better than the others.
"The Alamo" does not end with the Alamo, but
with the battle of San Jacinto. In the movie,
Houston's 600 men gallanty charge the waiting
Mexican army of thousands and drive them away,
winning independence. In real life, the Texans
attacked the Mexicans while they were taking
their afternoon siesta and were completely
defenseless. Figures.
"The Alamo" is an insult to the intelligence of
anyone who was not raised loving Texas more than
the United States. Texas is the only state I
know of where it's students have to say a "Texas
pledge" after the American Pledge of Allegiance
in School (for the record, I sit down and don't
participate in the Texas pledge). This type of
ignorance and arrogance made this movie. This
type of ignorance is what is wrong with America.
©
Written by Jacob Hall
TC Candler's Comment
n/a
Richard
Propes' Comment
I expected "The Alamo" to be
in my "B" range...I'd heard enough about it to
not expect a tremendous film, but I also have
enough interest in the subject and the cast to
expect this film to work much better than it
actually does.
This film centers around the 1835-1836 Alamo
Battles involving the legends Davy Crockett
(Thornton), Jim Bowie and others. While I am far
from an "Alamo" buff, I do have an interest in
the subject and everything I've read has
indicated this film is pretty accurate
historically considering its theatrical nature.
Thornton does a nice job here, and truly tries
to add some life to this film, but is surrounded
by a remarkably blase' script, especially
considering it is co-penned by Steve Gaghan (who
gave us "Traffic").
Dennis Quaid does alright here as Sam Houston,
but Jason Patric seems to sleepwalk through his
role as James Bowie. For an actor famous for his
demanding nature and refusal to play
fluff...well, he's given an incredibly meaty
role here and just completely blows it.
If you're going to "Remember the Alamo," I
suggest remembering the John Wayne version and
just letting this one rest in peace.


|