Flashing a movie-star smile and more charm than
a snake-handler, Josh Lucas has ascended the
Hollywood step-ladder quicker than most.
He has been compared to Steve McQueen on more
than one occasion, not only for his looks but
that rare innate ability to combine sex appeal,
heroic flare & an everyman quality that makes it
easy for an audience to root for him.
We
at IndependentCritics.com are delighted that he
took the time to sit for an interview about his
recent experience shooting the action
blockbuster, "Stealth".
Question:
When I talk to a lot of actors and ask why they
did a particular film, they always say ‘the
script.’ But one assumes there must be something
more about the genre or the location or the
filmmakers that draw them in.
Josh Lucas: Look,
this is a summer action film. I will be
straight. I have done a lot of films that are
very good but people have not seen. A film like
UNDERTOW is a great example. Part of that is
that you want to position yourself of having a
film like this as a vehicle to have a big summer
action film that is a rollercoaster ride.
Audiences will sit down in a theater and have 90
minutes of fun. Within it, the fun is not only
visual because I know the kind of films Rob
Cohen makes, but also within that idea this
technology is happening. The military just
ordered their last wave of manned military
planes. The next generation will be entirely
computer driven planes so the technology is
starting to correlate to the fictional sci-fi
element of what this film is. When the military
people came to see our set, they wanted to know
how we had this information. Our pilots told us
this would never happen and the military said
that it is happening.
Question: It sounds a bit similar to the
movie business with digital actors.
JL: It is a little
bit of a similar thing except in warfare they
don’t want to be losing pilots. In films, they
really just don’t want to deal with the egos
(laugh).
Question: Actors always talk about the
experience of doing a film like this where they
get to learn a craft that they never would have
been exposed to otherwise.
JL: I didn’t really
have a big sense of that. I think every young
man has that thought of being a fighter pilot
because it is the ultimate adrenalin mindset.
Some may jump from planes or climb mountains but
nothing compares to being a fighter pilot. The
interesting thing is that these guys are multi
faceted in their intelligence, having to know
all this mathematics, physiology and just their
athleticism. They are amazing athletes just in
having to deal with the G force. They will lose
anywhere between 12 to 15 pounds on a long
flight. It is extraordinary. They are soaked in
sweat when they come out. I liked that aspect of
it but also the experience of living on an
aircraft carrier for a period of time, landing
on the carrier and being catapulted off the
carrier. The research was fascinating. I did the
same simulation training that you might have
seen in AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN. I was
blindfolded in a helicopter that then crashes in
water. It gets flipped upside down and you are
thus disoriented underwater, still blindfolded
and you have to get out. The purpose of that was
to let you feel what it would be like at night.
When in your life would you ever go through
that? I did some extraordinary training for the
film because they wanted me to be certified to
go up in an F-18 if the military allowed it.
Question: How long did you train for?
JL: For me, it was
three weeks of solid military training, which
did not include the use of guns or the use of
things that this guy knew what to do as being
part of the Special Forces. I had some amazing
teachers. I did some weapon training with this
Special Forces commander in Australia. I learned
how one comes into a room and really clear a
room with a weapon to make sure they are safe.
Many times you see an actor in a film come in
with his gun down and that is not the right way.
The truth of the matter is that everything is
protected. You are carrying a 60-pound automatic
rifle and it takes awhile before it becomes
physically second nature because it is so
uncomfortable but it was an interesting
challenge. Then when the cast started coming
together, because it wasn’t a typical summer
action film cast, it made it that much more
exciting. We tried to make a film that was
playful and fun at its core but also had some
solid realistic sensibility to what we were
attempting to do.
Question: How well did you physically do
in that plane?
JL: One thing I did
was to get trained in the centrifuge. It was to
see how many G forces you can withstand. It
basically looks like this hammer throw and you
are inside this hammer and they spin it as fast
as they can to create basically the pressure
that happens to your veins and brain and blood
because all the blood drops to your feet. So you
learn all these breathing techniques, which I
used in the film. I thought that level of
legitimacy hadn’t been done before in terms of
dealing with these fighter pilots. Anyway, in
that centrifuge, they monitor your breathing
because it is easy to pass out. How does an
audience watch that and see that you are about
to pass out from the force? It looks cool to
them but it is realistic. That to me was where
the wonderful challenge was. It was not just put
an actor in it and we will make it look cool
later.
Question: Even though you did all of this
training, much of this film will be created
through computers. How well could you visualize
that as you sat in the pilot’s seat?
JL: What is
interesting about this movie is that literally
you are living in the creativity of a director’s
mind, his vision. Primarily the chunk of my time
making this movie was, imagine a 200 ton human
egg beater, a huge pole coming out of this
hydraulic device with the end of a cockpit
coming out of it. I had to climb 30 feet into
this thing and spent about 90% of my time in
this film wearing a helmet and a visor with a
canopy above me shooting with multiple cameras
moving all over the place. I was speaking
dialogue with nothing, no images around me. It
was an entire blue room with this massive set-up
of light. It was $6 million worth of lights that
simulated and emulated the clouds and the
movement of clouds and the movement of the
landscape when you were upside down. You are
physically being oriented in the cockpit in such
ways where you at one moment are being flipped
around and yet still having to do dialogue while
moving and dealing with G forces. This is just
what the pilots are doing because that egg
beater we are in can do a 5 G roll.
Question: Where was this?
JL: We shot this in
Sydney, Australia. The fighter pilots themselves
doing nothing above 7 or 8 G’s and so we were
almost at that level of movement. There was this
extraordinary symbiotic relationship to this
gimble and what the actual fighter pilot would
be doing. I have heard that we created this
genuine sense of movement and flying that hasn’t
been created before particularly that I was
being ripped and jerked as I was giving
speeches. Imagine two Russian MIG fighters, one
coming from the left and one from the right and
I am orienting myself and very quickly I
realized that I had to have such specific images
in my mind of these passing. In my training, I
worked with F-18 fighter pilots who did actual
search and rescue training and so I was able to
see their movements inside the cockpit. The
movement is amazing. They are like little
jackrabbits. Even though they are strapped down,
contained with seatbelt and breathing oxygen,
they are actually being pummeled by the movement
of this plane, jerking and knocking from side to
side. And you have to orient yourself to the
scene of this plane coming towards you. For
instance in one sequence, Jamie Foxx’s plane is
over on one side and we are having a
conversation, just as the plane takes a 30
degree bank going what feels like 3000 miles an
hour (laugh). Here I am trying to communicate
what is going on behind me, which could be a
missile launched towards me, but really knowing
that all that actually surrounds me will only
exist in a computer ten months later. The idea
of that, the director sees in his mind. He can’t
tell you to find the little green ball on set
because things are moving too fast. I have to
spit out this technical jargon and make it seem
extremely natural in a circumstance that is
extremely unnatural. It was a remarkable complex
challenge. We only got out during lunch because
it was so difficult to get us in and out that we
had to keep cohesive in the filming and not get
out for twenty minutes.
Question: You mentioned working with
these actual fighter pilots. Many police
officers or fire fighters complain how Hollywood
always gets their profession wrong. What were
their concerns about capturing the authenticity
of what they really do?
JL: I think it is
what I said before. They sense that everyone
makes it look incredibly easy while in reality;
you are losing 12 pounds of water weight during
the flight. It is like an Olympic athlete in
terms of their physical power yet they also have
to be working their mind in this incredible
mathematical and scientific way as they are
dealing with exercises of war. All of these
things are happening at the exact same time
while they are going 700 miles an hour with
someone chasing them. If we were really going to
attempt to do this, we had to recreate a
sequence where we were watching someone deal
with these incredible challenges at that same
time. That is what makes these guys so unique,
so unique and very elite. One tenth of one
hundredth of one percent ever make it to that
level.
Question: Did you get a sense of what
type of person can make that journey?
JL: I think it
comes down to focus. There is also a personal
ability to challenge themselves and deal with
extremely high stress and intense situations and
stay calm. Any emotion or physical upheaval in
your body would throw you and you could crash
your plane. There is extraordinary confidence
and a level of commitment and focus. They are
athletes physically and mentally in their
singular vision. To me, it was about meshing
those things into a character, who at the same
time was about to fall apart. Here was a man who
was on one hand being physically damaged by the
sheer force of his job as the movie goes on. On
the other hand, he was being mentally challenged
as well, going so far as to questioning his
commander, a confrontation that he has never
done before. There were these nuances and
emotional integrity to it. Not to put these guys
down, but this wasn’t the Stallone,
Schwarzenegger and Dolph Lundgren films that we
have seen before. It wasn’t what these movies
have been in the past. What Hollywood is doing
now is using actors like Matt Damon, Sam
Rockwell and Jamie Foxx in this film. These guys
are smart and creative actors as opposed to low
talking muscle men (laugh).
Question: Not many people get the
experience of living on an aircraft carrier. I
can only presume it is not the Four Seasons.
JL: The aircraft
carrier was the hardest thing about making this
film because you are literally in some ways in a
prison like environment. It is incredibly toxic
in just terms of the noise level alone. It is so
intense to be on those flight decks as those
planes come and go. It is one of the loudest
environments on Earth. These guys after a number
of weeks learn to sleep through it and just be
comfortable in it. But while you are there,
there is an adjustment period.
Question: If I am correct, you actually
shot on active carriers.
JL: Yes. We were
not a crew on board for a few days. We were
shooting during the war in Iraq. Our ship was on
war maneuvers. I was on the Reagan for training
and the Lincoln for shooting. We were totally at
the whim of the military. They were doing
exercises and we were shooting around those
exercises. They only included us as a favor.
They were not working around us. We were working
around them and the intensity of that was
incredible. The quarters were so small and yet
the ship was running in the finest tuned
clockwork. Here we put a Hollywood crew on board
and though they begrudgingly accommodated, that
challenge was tough. It was so claustrophobic.
Question: What was the difference for you
from the training in the simulator to actually
being up in the F 18?
JL: It was much
more jarring than any rollercoaster that you
would actual go on. I recall the first time I
did a catapult take-off from a carrier, where
the plane goes from 0 to 300 miles per hour in a
second and a half. I strapped myself in but I
really didn’t pay too much attention and they
kept saying to really strap myself down. When we
started, I slammed forward and almost cracked my
two kneecaps. The guy next to me says, “I told
you so.” It is not anything you can really
prepare for. It was also one of the childlike
dreams I got to accomplish by making this film.
Question: How much of the real technology
were you allowed to have while filming?
JL: We had no real
military equipment until we got to the aircraft
carrier. That was real but still we had a two
scale version of the plane with us. I heard that
the Chinese government saw satellite images and
immediately contacted the American government
asking about those planes. They were told it was
only a film prop but people thought they were
real. Rob Cohen likes to up the ante. We did one
explosion in Australia that was so big, it would
be seen from outer space, it had to be
registered so governments would know what was
going on.
Question: The film is not just a war film
but it is also about the dangers of relying too
much on technology.
JL: One of the
fascinating things about this movie is that they
have created this computer intelligence to such
an Nth degree that it begins to have an ego. It
sees my ego and so it emulates me. It sees my
roguish decision challenging behavior and takes
that to another degree. It thinks that, “If that
is human, I am smarter than that because I can
actually advance this and advance my own
programming because I can be smarter than the
people who created me.” We see that now how any
computer can beat someone playing chess. A
computer-controlled aircraft can handle three
times what a human body can handle. When the
computer sees that that is possible, he wants to
take over. In that sense, the whole idea of this
technology is fascinating because we are there.
They are now at a point that many of the bombers
are computer driven and the decisions happening
are made by the computers. If computers start to
have their own sense of intelligence, and that
might be thirty years in the future, if they can
beat us at chess who knows what else is next.
Question: Are you a technologically
proficient guy?
JL: No. I did not
grow up with video games. The military talks
about how a lot of these guys who turn out to be
fantastic pilots are great video game players.
It takes a great minutia for the eye
coordination and these guys have that.
Question: Speaking of growing up, let’s
go back to your beginnings in Arkansas. Were you
the popular kid in school?
JL: I think I am an
actor because I was part of this nomadic family
that moved around a lot. My parents were very
politically active and felt the need to go into
communities in the south and start an
organization to protest the development of
nuclear warheads. I am very interested to see
what my parents will think of this film. Oddly
enough, my character himself is having a moral
dilemma about what he is doing and what the
plane is doing and I had certain relationships
to that in regard to the way I grew up. I would
go into schools and sort of recreate my
personality as to what I liked at the last
school. If some guy was cool or an interesting
nerd, I would find that interesting personality
and emulate those.
Question: How many schools did you go to?
JL: I went to 30 by
the time I was 13. Then I went to one high
school and everything sort of stopped. That is
when I started acting. I didn’t like stability
at all. I didn’t like the fact we stopped moving
and acting provided this interesting outlet for
me to play with character building within
developing elements of my own personality.
Question: Was there a particular play
that set you off? Was it to meet girls?
JL: I did BLYTHE
SPIRIT when I was 14. There was a guy at the
high school I went to who was the cool guy at
the school and I liked him a lot. He was a
football player, did drama and debate. He was
very smart at developing these aspects of his
personality. He also had the most beautiful
girlfriend, named Daniella. I was smitten with
her, even though she was a senior and I was a
freshman. I liked how he did all these sports
and then did drama and so I thought I should try
that as well. I just wanted to emulate him. I
did love it though.
Question: Did you pursue it beyond
school?
JL: I started
driving up to Seattle and doing little plays and
started to try and get jobs in commercials. Upon
graduation I moved to LA and immediately got
cast on my first feature, which was ALIVE. I was
19 years old.
Question: Fresh from school, how prepared
were you for the big time? Did you think about
acting class or school?
JL: I had a couple
of years in Hollywood where I kind of realized
that I had no technique. I felt I had talent and
I felt I had worked with people who knew I had
talent but they were all theater trained actors
and they did both. George C. Scott told me that
I had talent but I needed to get on stage and
learn technique and different aspects of what
this job is. I then moved to New York. I didn’t
even attempt to enter Julliard because they
don’t allow you to work and go to school and I
still needed to make a living. I then took
private classes with some of their teachers and
sort of put myself through a program similar to
class. When you look at actors like Russell
Crowe and Sean Penn, they have great training.
Question: How much does instinct come
into play?
JL: For me, it was
discovering I had instinct first and then
realizing that if I had the other as well it
would be a combination that would allow me to
have a long career. I saw that people I knew
were not having long careers. They popped up for
a minute and thought they were movie stars but
they didn’t have the technique to fall back on.
I wanted to actually move from one performance
to another and not have the audience get bored
or stuck with one type of character. It would
have been very easy for me to have stayed with
the type of character from SWEET HOME ALABAMA
but that was the last thing I wanted to do. That
is why I immediately went to show other people
and myself that I could do anything else so I
could move from one thing to the next. This was
so they wouldn’t expect things.
Question: There have been many films in
your career that seemed to be the ones that were
poised to make you the star, but it just didn’t
seem to happen. Then you would switch and play
these types of characters that were edgy.
JL: I think I was
trying to run away from certain aspects of my
personality and then develop my own
understanding of what I do. I didn’t want to
utilize things that would have been easy to fall
back on. Now I want to use elements from SWEET
HOME ALABAMA or UNDERTOW and adding things to
those types of characters to make them complex.
That is what makes someone like Russell Crowe so
great. He can be charming and sexy and roguish
in his characters but at the same time have this
deep, dark emotional undercurrent that makes him
be able to do A BEAUTIFUL MIND or CINDERELLA
MAN. Actors like him and Sean Penn are the
prominent influences on my life.
Question: Those two guys are also quite
private in talking about themselves and keep an
air of mystery about them. Do you feel that you
might need to follow that path as well?
JL: It is a great
question because I have stayed away from that. I
have not put myself out there in any way to be a
paparazzi personality. I have limited certain
aspects of my career and that is another reason
why I did something like STEALTH, to put myself
out there so I am a viable commodity to be
someone that the studio knows will be a person
who audiences will go see. Russell and Sean both
have done that. They do these movies where they
can prove that to an extent. I also have not
beaten up a photographer yet (laugh). I don’t
have a lot of baggage for an audience. Some
actors do have that and that paparazzi
personality can make you limiting for certain
directors who might want to work with you.
Question: In reference to your persona,
there have been some who have commented on your
quiet masculinity, much in the same way of a
Steve McQueen or Robert Mitchum. Do you see that
as well?
JL: I absolutely
sense that. There was a core of actors that I
grew up with, some who became quite famous, but
many were quite slight. So when it came to
moving on to a strong male presence in the movie
star system, they didn’t have the weight
underneath them. That is why we have gone to
certain European countries for people like
Javier Bardem, an actor who comes across on
screen as a real man. It is an actor like that
whom I admire so I needed myself to get there
and fill out as a human being. I knew I wanted
to push myself and not make choices that would
put me in a position to be famous but be
limited.
Question: How did you not get seduced by
the great infusion of money that seems to be
thrown towards certain actors?
JL: I think I was
lucky in that I did not have a lifestyle that
needed to be fed that way. I was living decently
enough and so I didn’t need that. I saw people
jump the gun and so I saw people do bad movies
to support a lifestyle. I guess being poor and
not building those things up buffered me.
Question: It does seem to be that your
characters in film have been all over the place
and maybe audiences have had a hard time
grasping just who you are. Was there a risk in
choosing to be so eclectic?
JL: There is a risk
and some might say it didn’t pay off but I think
it did. I sort of dropped out of the Hollywood
eye after SWEET HOME ALABAMA even though I was
working with people like Ang Lee. In my mind,
those are the types of directors I wanted to
connect with. Some might feel I dropped out
because I didn’t utilize that pop but I didn’t
need to be the lead yet.
Question: Is it true you have already
appeared in 30 films?
JL: I have been in
a lot of movies. Someone asked me the other day
how I planned to deal with success and I said I
have dealt with failure a lot. So I cannot
imagine that success can be that much harder. I
have had a lot of movies that didn’t work and
somewhere I just didn’t work in them either.
Walter Matthau said that the best thing that
could happen to an actor is to do the rehearsal
of a play, have the play open and then let the
play fail. What you are doing is learning not
only about yourself as an actor, but what
doesn’t work. When you see that, then you can
switch it. If you are always successful, you
might learn what works but you have no risk of
failure. I am not afraid of failure. I feel
careers are a wave, that come and go and so I am
not afraid of that wave anymore. It will just be
the next phase.
Question: When you did get that wave of
success, how did you position yourself to not
become just another product on the shelf?
JL: You have to
utilize it and a certain responsibility that
way.
Question: In the film, you are advised
not to have a relationship with your co-worker
because it can complicate things. You are in a
profession where people cross that line all the
time. Do you see a danger in that?
JL: Yes, I do think
so. Actors that have off camera chemistry while
they are doing a movie seem to create a wall in
regard to what is happening on camera. I was in
a great, serious relationship while I was making
STEALTH and oddly that enhanced my performance.
I do think that actors that have affairs while
on set end up not having a great performance
(laugh). It comes down to that yearning.
Forbidden fruit creates that sparkle that comes
across on screen.
Question: You got to shoot in Australia
and Thailand. How did that lend itself to the
making of the movie?
JL: First of all,
that has to be one of the most beautiful
countries on Earth. The purity of the people and
the Buddhist beauty to them was just amazing.
Here we were making this wild movie but we were
at the end of our shoot and we needed to be
spoiled with a nice hotel and people. I loved
the other side to the movie. These characters
live in this toxic environment but then they are
given this sparkling R and R. It did give us the
opportunity to put Jessica in a bikini (laugh).
Sydney was great and I loved the people there.
For me, I was doing 6 day shoots, 16 hours a day
so in my time off, I slept. I lived on Bondi
Beach with naked women underneath my porch but I
slept (laugh).
Question: As Tom Cruise attested in TOP
GUN, do you share the “need for speed?”
JL: Yeah. I have
this cool little car I bought recently. I was
driving on these back roads in New Mexico and
got to 130 miles per hour. I was scared.
Question: How fast did you go in the
jets?
JL: I guess about
500 miles per hour but I didn’t enjoy it. I was
a bit too nauseous (laugh).
Question:
Thank you so much for chatting with us!
JL: Yeah.
Thanks for having me.
"Stealth" is
currently available on DVD.
Thanks to Alex at DNA-PR for Permission for this
Interview.
©
TC Candler - www.independentcritics.com